« On Editing by Brian Edwards | Main | My Life as a Fish by Brian Edwards »
Wednesday
Sep092009

Silly boys by Mike Barrett

 

 

The image in
my head
was of a boy

falling

toward his
instinct

against his
better
judgement.

Not that his
infidelity

is a laughing
matter

but the image
of him
giving in

made me
giggle
out loud
in my bed.

We passed
each other
in the
morning
   
like two
silly boys:

chocolate
round
his mouth

his belly sore

a hand
pressed tight
to my face

like a small
dam.

Reader Comments (15)

What a super write Mike! Really fine.

One tiny nit: consider nixing the 3rd "his"?

Not that
infidelity

is a laughing matter

I know that changes the meaning slightly, makes the poem broader, less intimate and that's probably not a good thing, but there does seem to be quite a lot of pronouns in this short poem and those 3 are particularly close together. Maybe you could add "per se"? I think it evens the pacing:

Not that
infidelity

is a laughing matter
per se

Really love these lines:

a hand
pressed tight
to my face

like a small
dam.

The ambiguity of whose hand is quite dazzling.

I see you don't have a Portfolio yet Mike. You can request one here

B.

~

September 9, 2009 at 11:23AM | Registered CommenterBrian Edwards

Hi

My immediate thought was wonder at the state of mind of the characters.
That wonder makes the poem for me.

I would be inclinded to remove "in my head"
from the first stanza, it becomes clear.

You use the word "image" again in stanza 7.
It seemed conspicous.

September 9, 2009 at 11:30AM | Registered CommenterScott Douglas

thanks, brian, i shall mull over your suggestion: a very valid one indeed. i once had 'inherently' in there, but felt it too clunky.

(oh, and i must have submitted my portfolio request as you typed the message!)

September 9, 2009 at 11:37AM | Registered CommenterMike Barrett

Enjoyable in the extreme. Certainly.

Incites me to, "more spare, more spare, more spare".

Upon initial read, I see Brian's point about nixing the third "his", but upon subsequent reads, I fink, 'twere it mine, I would be inclined instead to nix the first and second "his"-es, which, with or without, can be read as degrees-in-redux of implicit, and keep the third, for continued particularity.

(I suspect that communicates what I mean better in my head than it does on screen.)

falling
toward
instinct

against
better
judgement.

Not that his
infidelity

is a laughing
matter

September 9, 2009 at 11:40AM | Registered CommenterShari-Lyn McArthur

hi scott, glad you found some wonder in here.

will also think on your suggestion, thank you.

September 9, 2009 at 11:41AM | Registered CommenterMike Barrett

I like "in my head" for the rhyme and in particular the contrast with "in my bed".

I like the repetition of "image", but will think on some more.

September 9, 2009 at 11:44AM | Registered CommenterShari-Lyn McArthur

Reading Shari's suggestion, I think nixing the second "his" works but the first scans awkwardly, for me.

I like the repetition of image too.

September 9, 2009 at 12:39PM | Registered CommenterBrian Edwards

I'm with Brian's initial suggestion of cutting the 'his' before infidelity; other than that, c'est magnifique.

james

September 9, 2009 at 8:33PM | Registered Commenterjamesthomashoward

Just wanted to chime in and say this is a wonderfully self-censored poem. The way it skirts uncomfortably around the centre of the event is brilliant - the hand at the end demonstrating that rather neatly.

As for crits, wot Brian & James sed.

September 10, 2009 at 2:33AM | Registered CommenterD W

I'd really like to see it stay as "his fidelity", no matter if all the his-es stay or go.

One's own infidelity and that of any other(s) are really such very very different matters. I quite like how that possessive makes it (infidelity) so particular, paradoxically (mebbe not paradoxically in such a character piece) it brings me more meaning by being so particular.

(edited in order to type the word "particular" just one more time)

September 11, 2009 at 9:41AM | Registered CommenterShari-Lyn McArthur

don´t like the idea of ´per se´, it´s too formal. the poem as it stands is very fine, i think.... some fucking about with the number of "his"´s might help....

September 13, 2009 at 5:00AM | Registered Commenterpete pick

Just read this again and the his'es bothered me less.

Please remember to re-post this to your portfolio, when you are satisfied, if you would like it to be considered for showcasing on our home-page and in our future print publications.

Blah.

B.

~

September 13, 2009 at 8:11AM | Registered CommenterBrian Edwards

It really does shine, and not in that surface sort of shiny&new way. It shines with the polish achieved through being handled.

September 13, 2009 at 8:17AM | Registered CommenterShari-Lyn McArthur

What about even more "his"es?

but the image
of his
giving in

September 13, 2009 at 8:19AM | Registered CommenterShari-Lyn McArthur

Hell, why not more is'es, too?

The image in
my head
is of a boy

September 13, 2009 at 8:26AM | Registered CommenterBrian Edwards
Member Account Required
You must have a member account on this website in order to post comments. Log in to your account to enable posting.